ROSENWASSER et al v. CHIA et al - Page 2




                  Interference No.  105,202                                                                                                               
                  Rosenwasser v.  Chia                                                                                                                    
                           On August 24, 2004, senior party Chia filed a paper stating that it abandons the contest                                       
                  defined by this interference and requests entry of adverse judgment as to all claims.  On the same                                      
                  date, senior party Chia filed a paper requesting express abandonment of its involved Application                                        
                  10/302,530.  On August 30, 2004, senior party Chia filed a supplement to its request for express                                        
                  abandonment, enclosing a corresponding paper requesting express abandonment to be entered in                                            
                  the file of its involved application.  These requests are treated collectively as a single request for                                  
                  entry of adverse judgment.  See 37 CFR § 1.662(a).                                                                                      
                           The request for entry of adverse judgment is granted.  It is                                                                   
                           ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the sole count, Count 1, is herein                                           
                  entered against senior party MEANG K. CHIA, CHEO K. CHIA and HUY K. CHIA;                                                               
                           FURTHER ORDERED that senior party MEANG K. CHIA, CHEO K. CHIA and HUY                                                          
                  K. CHIA is not entitled to its application claims 80-96 which correspond to the count;                                                  
                           FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                                               
                  the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and                                                                          
                           FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective                                                       
                  involved application or patent of the parties.                                                                                          









                                                                          - 2 -                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007