The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte EARNEY E. STOUTENBURG and DEAN A. SEIFERT
Appeal No. 2002-0083
Application No. 09/416,518
ORDER VACATING ORDER PURSUANT
TO 37 CFR § 1.14(g)
On January 8, 2004, the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences (hereinafter the "Board") mailed an "Order Pursuant
to 37 CFR § 1.14(g)" (Paper No. 16) notifying appellants of its
intent to publish the decision mailed on October 16, 2003 (Paper
No. 15). Counsel for appellants responded to the Board in a
communication filed on March 9, 2004 (Paper No. 17) indicating
that appellants did not object to the publication of their
decision mailed on October 16, 2003 (Paper No. 15).
After careful review, the Board discovered that the Order
was entered in error (Paper No. 16). Therefore, the Board is
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007