The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHRISTOPHER R. JONES, CHRISTOPHER R. BROWN, MICHAEL
A. SCHMIDT, SANKAR RAMASUBRAMANIAN, SEAN L. FLYNN, EDWARD JASON
ANDERSON, MARK H. ENOMOTO, GAYNA WILLIAMS, and BRYAN T. STARBUCK
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-0654
Application No. 09/024,311
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
In the paper filed April 16, 2004, appellants request that
we rehear our decision dated February 13, 2004, wherein we
affirmed the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1, 2, 9,
10, 13 through 19 and 29, all claims on appeal, under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007