The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CARL M. PANASIK and ANTHONY B. WOOD,
_____________
Appeal No. 2002-1032
Application No. 08/829,278
______________
HEARD: March 13, 2003
_______________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of March 21, 2003 wherein
we affirmed the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-11, 14 and 16-23 under 35
U.S.C. §103.
In particular, appellants contend that our decision is in error because we did not
designate our definition of “antenna segment” as a new ground of rejection because it
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007