The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 65
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STANLEY KUGELL and DAVID SILVER
____________
Appeal No. 2003-1924
Application No. 08/554,533
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McQUADE, NASE, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to the appellants' request for rehearing1 of our decision mailed
July 7, 2004, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 16, 17, 20, 23, 27, 30,
32 through 39, 42, 45, 49, 52, 54 through 62, 65, 68, 72, 75, and 77 through 81 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over McLeod in view of Murphy and reversed
1 Filed August 31, 2004.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007