The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte LEONARD L. MAZUR __________ Appeal No. 2004-0394 Application No. 09/915,467 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. REQUEST FOR REHEARING Appellant requests reconsideration (rehearing) of the Board’s decision entered February 26, 2004 (Decision), vacating the rejection of record in favor of new grounds of rejection under 37 CFR § 1.196(b). Appellant’s “Request for Rehearing” (Request) is premised upon the assertion that the “new grounds for rejection appear based on a misunderstanding of the time sequence of the prior art.” Request, page 2. Claims 1 and 6 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below: 1. An educational article of manufacture useful to increase patient awareness of the teratogenicity of a pharmaceutical, said article of manufacture comprising: a teratogenic pharmaceutical packaged together with a contraceptive; and labeling specifying avoidance of pregnancy while using said teratogenic pharmaceutical.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007