The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MATTHEW LEVINE
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0609
Application No. 09/900,787
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 8, 10 through 14 and
16. Claims 91 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon rejected base claims, but
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the
base claims and any intervening claims.
1 Claim 16 depends from objected to claim 9.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007