The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT ANDREW KERTIS
and PETER JOHN WINDLER
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0650
Application No. 09/894,265
____________
ON BRIEF
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-7 and 10-13, which are all of the claims pending in the
present application. Claims 8 and 9 have been canceled.
The claimed invention relates to the detection of the
amplitude of an electronic signal in which current comparisons are
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007