The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 15 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JEFFREY M. GROSS and MATTHEW H. PARKER ____________ Appeal No. 2004-0953 Application No. 09/215,593 ____________ HEARD: January 13, 2005 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, LEVY, and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-17 and 19-22, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND Appellants' invention relates to an electronic document proofing system. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007