Appeal No. 2004-0995
Application No. 09/984,546
at the top of column 3, figures 1a, 1b depict the hardware
configuration of the pen-based peripheral device or viewer 100 in
these figures, where figures 3a-3c relate to a block diagram
format of the software environment 300 under which the viewer 100
and host computer 101 operate and where figure 4 shows a pen
control program state diagram to provide the viewer 100 remote
control of the host computer 101. The artisan would therefore
well appreciate that only a single embodiment with a structural
and software-functional type of environments are depicted in the
figures relied upon by the examiner and us in reaching our
decision.
Because appellant’s remaining arguments in the brief are
wrongly bottomed on the view that only one video buffer is
disclosed in this reference, we do not agree with appellant’s
additional assertions that Banerjee does not teach two video
buffers selectively providing images to a single display as
recited in clause “b” of claim 7 on appeal. It is not disputed
that the Video Event Buffer 305 in figures 3a and 3c buffer video
images from the non-portable computer that are received over the
wireless transceiver to the single display, LCD 113c/409.
Correspondingly, the Pen Event Buffer 302 in figures 3a, 3c and
the image buffering for local inking operations (401, 402, 405
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007