Ex Parte BANAVAR et al - Page 2



         Appeal No. 2004-1082                                                       
         Application No. 09/106,166                                                 

         switching between pessimistic notifications and optimistic                 
         notifications.                                                             
              Independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                         
              1. In a system including a plurality of distributed sites,            
         wherein each site is adapted to run at least one application and           
         application state information is maintained at a plurality of              
         local and remote sites, a method comprising the steps of:                  
              receiving a request for an update to said state information           
         at a local site;                                                           
              generating an update to said state information maintained at          
         said local site, in response to said request for an update to the          
         state information;                                                         
              generating a notification of said update to said                      
         application; and                                                           
              dynamically switching between an optimistic notification              
         mode and a pessimistic notification mode.                                  
              The examiner relies on the following references:                      
         Alonso                    6,061,683             May 9, 2000                
              (filed Feb. 27, 1998)                                                 
         Strom et al. “Concurrency Control and View Notification                    
         Algorithms for Collaborative Replicated Objects”, IEEE 04/1998,            
         pp. 1-17. (Strom)                                                          
              Claims 1-7 and 12-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)          
         as anticipated by Alonso.                                                  
              Claims 1-16 stand further rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as          
         anticipated by Strom.                                                      

                                        -2-                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007