The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication in and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte THEODORE E. BRUNING III, RANDAL S. MARKS, JULIA A.
HODGES, RYAN J. JOHNSON, BERT MARTENS, KAREN E. WORKMAN,
SUSAN G. ELKINGTON, RICHARD F. LARY, JESSE YANDELL, STEPHEN
SICOLA AND ROGER OAKEY
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-1190
Application No. 09/286,160
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RUGGIERO, MACDONALD and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 8 and 10 through 20. For the reasons
stated infra we reverse the examiner’s rejection of these claims.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007