The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication in a law journal and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PETER DOUGLAS HIRSCH
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-1365
Application No. 09/139,808
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of
claims 11 through 13, 18, 19, 22 and 52 through 69, which constitute all the
claims remaining in the application. For the reasons stated infra we reverse.
Invention
The invention relates to a system to edit a computer implemented property
of an object with dynamic properties (see page 2 of appellant’s specification).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007