Appeal No. 2004-1413 Application No. 09/475,941 independent claim 7 to be broader than independent claim 1 as discussed above. Since appellants have elected to group all the claims together, we will similarly group claims 8-11 as falling with independent claim 7. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed, and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 7-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED-IN-PART JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) MAHSHID D. SAADAT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JLD:clm 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007