Appeal No. 2004-1451 Application No. 09/360,262 As for the examiner's § 103 rejections, appellants simply advance that "[t]he deficiencies in the Redding patent cannot be overcome through combination with either The Polymer Handbook or the Fennema reference" (page 7 of Brief, second paragraph). In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well- stated by the examiner, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (effective Sep. 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (Aug. 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (Sep. 7, 2004)). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) BEVERLY PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007