Ex Parte Bahrenburg et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                              Paper No. 25              
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
                  Ex parte STEFAN BAHRENBURG, CHRISTOPH EUSCHER, TOBIAS WEBBER,                                         
                        PAUL WALTER BAIER, JURGEN MAYER, AND JOHANNES SCHLEE                                            
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                 Appeal No. 2004-1573                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/494,780                                               
                                                     ____________                                                       
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                     ____________                                                       
              Before THOMAS, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       


                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                     A patent examiner rejected claims 1-4, 6, 9, and 11-15.  The appellants appeal                     
              therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                          


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention at issue on appeal concerns mobile radio communications.  (Spec.                     
              at 1.)  According to the appellants, a known radio communications system uses both                        
              Code Division Multiple Access ("CDMA") and Time Division Multiple Access ("TDMA")                         
              to separate subscribers.  "Joint Detection" is used at the receiving end to detect                        







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007