Appeal No. 2004-1689 Application 09/912,132 patent, col. 10, lines 29-33), i.e., 4(4/4): 3(3/4) = 16:9, so the process can be reversed by up-sampling the vertical by 4/3. The color difference blocks can also be up-sampled, e.g., from 4:2:0 to 4:2:2. However, while there is up-sampling in Campisano, it is only to change the aspect ratio and not to up-sample the resolution "to the first resolution" as required by all of the independent claims 1 and 10-12. There is no motivation in Campisano to up-scale back to a first resolution. Accordingly, we conclude that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness as to the independent claims. Vetro does not cure the deficiencies of Choi and Campisano with respect to the rejection of the independent claims. Therefore, the rejection of claims 1-12 is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) )) BOARD OF PATENT HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ROBERT E. NAPPI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 9 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007