Ex Parte Bober et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               
                                                                                        Paper No. 22                          
                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                      __________                                                              

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                        __________                                                            
                                     Ex parte PAUL M. BOBER, URESH VAHALIA,                                                   
                                      AJU JOHN, JEFFREY L. ALEXANDER, and                                                     
                                                     UDAY K. GUPTA                                                            
                                                         __________                                                           
                                                  Appeal No. 2004-1899                                                        
                                                Application No. 09/608,469                                                    
                                                        __________                                                            
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                        __________                                                            
              Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                          

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on the appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5,                           
              24-28, and 45-49.  Claims 6-23, 29-44, and 50-65 have been allowed.                                             
                      The claimed invention relates to the migration of a file system from a source file                      
              server to a target file server in a data network while permitting clients to have concurrent                    
              read/write access to the file system.  In order to transfer the file system from the source                     
              file server to the target file server, the target server issues directory and file read                         
              requests to the source file server in accordance with a network file access                                     








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007