Ex Parte Stanczak - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.       
                                                      Paper No. 18                  
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                     ____________                                   
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                     ____________                                   
                             Ex parte EDMUND A. STANCZAK                            
                                     ____________                                   
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1903                               
                             Application No. 09/973,741                             
                                     ____________                                   
                                       ON BRIEF                                     
                                     ____________                                   
         Before RUGGIERO, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent            
         Judges.                                                                    
         RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                
              This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of          
         claims 1-7, 9-12, 14, 15, and 21-23.  Claims 17-20 have been               
         canceled, and claims 8, 13, 16 have been indicated by the Examiner         
         to contain allowable subject matter subject to being rewritten in          
         independent form.  An amendment filed October 6, 2003 after final          
         rejection was denied entry by the Examiner.                                
              The claimed invention relates to a wheel hub assembly having          
         first and second bearing assemblies which are positioned on                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007