The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte EDMUND A. STANCZAK ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1903 Application No. 09/973,741 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before RUGGIERO, BLANKENSHIP, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7, 9-12, 14, 15, and 21-23. Claims 17-20 have been canceled, and claims 8, 13, 16 have been indicated by the Examiner to contain allowable subject matter subject to being rewritten in independent form. An amendment filed October 6, 2003 after final rejection was denied entry by the Examiner. The claimed invention relates to a wheel hub assembly having first and second bearing assemblies which are positioned onPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007