The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARLIE C. BAGGETT, JR. and JOHN J. ADAMS
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1911
Application No. 09/558,387
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before THOMAS, BARRY and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 32-38, 40-45 and 76-88. Claims 1-31, 39 and
46-75 have been canceled.
We reverse.
BACKGROUND
Appellants’ invention is directed to information security
assessments that take into account domains within an enterprise.
Users are interviewed base on an enterprise type, domains within
1 For the reasons discussed in the decision, the oral hearing scheduled
for January 11, 2005 was deemed unnecessary by the panel and was vacated.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007