Ex Parte SUNDHOLM - Page 7




              Appeal No. 2004-1977                                                               Page 7                
              Application No. 09/297,256                                                                               


              cure for the above-discussed deficiency of the combination of Diquattro and Lockwood,                    
              we must also cannot reverse the rejection of claim 8, which depends ultimately from                      
              claim 1, as being unpatentable over Diquattro in view of Lockwood and Willms.                            





































Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007