The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BRIAN PARSONNET, LANE D. DESBOROUGH and TARIQ SAMAD ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1980 Application No. 10/153,2001 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 31-55. Claims 1-30 have been canceled. We affirm. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed generally to brokering service requests between a plurality of customers and a plurality 1 According to Appellants, this application is a divisional of Application No. 09/474,948, filed December 30, 1999.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007