The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte YUKIHISA KATO, NAOYA HIRAYAMA, TOSHIKAZU OMORI, MUNEHIRO HOSHINO, and YUTAKA FUJII __________ Appeal No. 2004-2197 Application No. 09/144,851 ___________ HEARD: Jan. 12, 2005 ___________ Before PAK, OWENS, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2004) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 21 through 24 and 27 through 31 in the above-identified application (final Office action mailed Jan. 9, 2003). The subject matter on appeal relates to a method for producing a fruit vinegar. According to the appellants, “it has been found [in citrus fruit juices used as starting materialsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007