Ex Parte Douin et al - Page 1




                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           


                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                     __________                                                         
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                                Ex parte VERONIQUE DOUIN, BENEDICTE CAZIN,                                              
                                 JEAN-THIERRY SIMONNET, and ODILE AUBRUN                                                
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2004-2205                                                    
                                             Application No. 09/766,403                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                              HEARD January 13, 2005                                                    
                                                     __________                                                         
              Before MILLS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                       
              rejection of claims 1-9, 11-21, 23-25, 30, 33, 50, 51, and 55-84, all of the claims                       
              remaining.  Claims 1, 71, 73, 75, 79, and 80 are representative and read as follows:                      
                     1.     An oil-in-water nanoemulsion comprising oil globules with an average size                   
                            of less than 150nm comprising at least one oil, at least one amphiphilic                    
                            lipid, and at least one nonionic polymer comprising at least one                            
                            hydrophobic block and at least one hydrophilic block.                                       
                     71.    A composition for caring for a keratin material chosen from body skin,                      
                            facial skin, mucous membranes, the scalp, the hair, the nails, the                          
                            eyelashes, and the eyebrows comprising a nanoemulsion comprising oil                        
                            globules with an average size of less than 150nm comprising at least one                    
                            oil, at least one amphiphilic lipid, and at least one nonionic polymer                      






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007