Ex Parte BARKER et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                     for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                                                                                            Paper No. 20                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                         

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                       ____________                                                      
                            Ex parte FREDERICK H. BARKER and RICHARD E. PERUGGI                                          
                                                       ____________                                                      
                                                  Appeal No. 2004-2209                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/406,445                                                
                                                       ____________                                                      
                                                        ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                       ____________                                                      
              Before FRANKFORT, PATE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                            
              PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         



                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      


                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 15-21, 23-31, 33 and 34.                       
              Claims 22 and 32, the only other remaining claims in the application, stand withdrawn                      
              from consideration as directed to a non-elected species.                                                   
                     The claims are directed to a guide rail safety device for an elevator car riding on                 
              a non-metallic guide rail formed of concrete.  The guide rail safety device is comprised                   










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007