Ex Parte Nordgren et al - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                Ex parte DOUGLAS S. NORDGREN and JOHN W. LUBKER, II                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2004-2244                                  
                             Application No. 10/208,906                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, PAK, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 42-71.           
          The subject matter on appeal relates to a sheathing adapted                 
          to be fastened to a wall supporting structure which comprises a             
          first layer comprising a polymeric foam and a second layer                  
          comprising a woven polymeric scrim having means for reinforcing             
          its periphery so as to inhibit failure of the scrim.  This                  
          appealed subject matter is adequately represented by independent            
          claim 42 which reads as follows:                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007