The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GERALD W. INGRAM and STEVE MANSFIELD ____________ Appeal No. 2004-2266 Application No. 09/847,9991 ____________ HEARD: MARCH 10, 2005 ____________ Before KRASS, BARRY and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 31-33, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claims 1-30 have been canceled. We affirm. BACKGROUND Appellants’ invention is directed to the use of an enhanced hyperlink that enables users to either save an intended hyperlink 1 Application for patent filed May 4, 2001, which claims the filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of the provisional Applications No. 60/202,029, filed May 4, 2000 and No. 60/283,142, filed April 12, 2001, is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 09/594,784, filed June 16, 2000, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007