The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GADI EISNER ____________ Appeal No. 2004-2299 Application No. 09/244,006 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 23 through 67, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to decorative articles with a three-dimensional character face attached onto a surface of the decorative article, where the decorative article may include a hair brush, a hand mirror, or articles of jewelry while the three-dimensional character facesPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007