Appeal No. 2004-2322 Page 8
Application No. 09/385,412
Summary
The references cited by the examiner would have reasonably suggested the
invention of claim 1 to a person of ordinary skill in the art. The rejection of claim 1 is
affirmed. Claims 2-29 fall with claim 1.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
Joan Ellis )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Donald E. Adams )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Eric Grimes )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EG/dym
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007