Appeal No. 2004-2356 Page 14
Application No. 09/833,740
§ 112, second paragraph. Thus, although the subject matter may not be
adequately described as discussed above, the skilled artisan would understand
the bounds of the claimed subject matter, and the rejection is reversed.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-5 and 9-11 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, for lack of adequate written description is affirmed for claims 1-5 and
9, but reversed for claims 10 and 11. The rejection of claims 1-5 and 9-11 under
35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter that applicant regards as the invention, is
reversed for all the claims.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007