Ex Parte KATZ - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2005-0007                                                        
          Application 09/364,675                                                      

               The examiner has listed a host of limitations in each of the           
          claims on appeal that are allegedly not supported by the                    
          originally filed application (answer, pages 4 through 6).  The              
          examiner states, for example, that:                                         
                    Claims 24-31 recite the use of “travel cards” for                 
               “handling telephone calls” in a “telephone system                      
               controllable by travel cards.”  However, appellant’s                   
               specification contains no teaching or suggestion of using              
               “travel cards” but, instead, discloses a lottery system to             
               which a caller from a valid telephone number can participate           
               using information on a lottery ticket.  A travel card is a             
               telephone credit calling card which is issued by a service             
               provider and enables a caller to place long distance calls             
               over any phone and to charge the call to the card’s account.           
               In contrast, appellant’s specification is directed to a                
               lottery system to which a caller from a valid telephone                
               number can participate using information on a lottery ticket           
               (see Figure 2; page 4, line 12-page 5, line 13; page 21,               
               line [ ]-page 23, line 21; page 34, Abstract).  A travel               
               card and a lottery ticket are separate, distinct entities              
               which carry out completely different functions.  A telephone           
               travel card is issued by a telephone company to enable a               
               customer to place a long distance call over any phone and to           
               charge the call to the account of the accountholder.  The              
               lottery ticket described in appellant’s specification allows           
               a user to participate in a lottery, not to place a call to a           
               desired second party over any telephone.  Therefore, the               
               lottery ticket described in appellant’s specification cannot           
               be considered as a travel card as is defined in the                    
               telephony art.  (Answer, page 4).                                      
               The examiner is also of the opinion (answer, page 5) that              
          “Appellant’s specification does not provide support for a [sic]             
          using a caller’s automatic number identification and a PIN number           
          and a parameter relating to the card for determining whether the            
                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007