Appeal No. 2005-0028
Application No. 09/489,602
In light of the foregoing, we will not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of independent claims 1, 10, 17 and 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Schmidt in view of
Bezin, or the rejection of dependent claims 4 through 9, 11
through 16, 18 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on those
same references. Thus, the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
WILLIAM F. PATE III ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF:pgc
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007