The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LEIGH L. KLOTZ, JR., GLEN W. PETRIE, ROBERT S. BAUER,
DANIEL DAVIES, and JULIA A. CRAIG
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-0052
Application No. 09/192,014
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before RUGGIERO, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-6, 11, 14, and 15, which are all of the claims pending
in the present application. Claims 7-10, 12, and 13 have been
canceled.
The claimed invention relates to a method and system for
processing hard copy documents based on information in user
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007