The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GARY A. LENZ and
GARY M. KLINEFELTER
____________
Appeal No. 2005-0074
Application No. 09/739,080
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of claims 33 through 36, 39 and 49. The
remaining claims in this application are claims 1-32, 37, 38, 40-
48 and 50-53, which stand withdrawn from further consideration by
the examiner as directed to a non-elected invention (Brief, page
2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellants, the invention is directed to an
identification card personalization device that is used to create
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007