Appeal No. 2005-0133
Application 10/037,390
Renner, we agree with appellants that the type of conversion
described therein has nothing to do with a conversion of compiled
applications as recited in claim 106. There is no rational basis
for attempting to add the conversion as taught by Renner to the
system of Peyret.
With respect to representative, independent claim 145, we
find that this claim contains similar limitations to claim 106
considered above as well as additional limitations. Therefore,
we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 145 or of
any of the other claims of Group II for reasons discussed above.
Since all the claims of Group III are claims which depend from
claims in Groups I or II, we also do not sustain the rejection of
any of the claims in Group III for the reasons discussed above.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007