Ex Parte Pompetzki et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0138                                                        
          Application No. 09/618,044                                                  

          weight is subjected to a liquid-phase hydrogenation in at least two         
          process stages (Brief, page 2).1  Representative independent claim          
          1 is reproduced below:                                                      
               1.  A process for the hydrogenation of acetone, which                  
          comprises:                                                                  
               conducting the liquid-phase hydrogenation of acetone having a          
          water content of less than or equal to 1.0% by weight in at least           
          two hydrogenation process stages, thereby preparing isopropanol             
          product.                                                                    
               The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence          
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Hiles et al. (Hiles)          4,626,604          Dec. 02, 1986              
          Fukuhara et al. (Fukuhara)    5,081,321          Jan. 14, 1992              
          The Sigma Catalog (Sigma), p. 1681, 1994 edition.2                          
               The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as unpatentable over Fukuhara in view of Hiles (Answer, page 3).            

               1                                                                      
               1We refer to and cite from the Brief dated Jan. 22, 2004.              
               2                                                                      
               2We note that this reference was relied upon in the                    
          statement of the rejection in the Office action dated Oct. 23,              
          2003, Paper No. 22, page 2.  This reference was listed as “Prior            
          Art of Record” on page 3 of the Answer but was not in the                   
          statement of the rejection in the Answer (see also page 3).                 
          However, the examiner relies upon this reference on page 6 of the           
          Answer as evidence that “commercially available acetone contains            
          less that [sic, than] 1.0% by weight of water.”  Appellants have            
          argued the merits of this reference (Brief, pages 5-6; Reply                
          Brief, page 1).  Therefore we consider this reference as part of            
          the evidence of obviousness.  Cf., In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341,               
          1342 n.3, 166 USPQ 406, 407 n.3 (CCPA 1970).                                
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007