Ex Parte Tomiyama et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2005-0156                                                        
          Application No. 09/816,348                                                  

          requires “a reinforcing portion provided in the vicinity of an              
          end portion of the stator, wherein the reinforcing portion                  
          includes a ring portion and a cylinder portion extending from an            
          outer peripheral edge of the ring portion.”  Claim 11 requires              
               a reinforcing portion provided in the vicinity of an                   
               end portion of the stator, wherein the reinforcing                     
               portion includes bent portions that are formed by end                  
               portions of the case body that are bent toward an                      
               inside thereof, intermittently around an inner                         
               circumferential surface thereof, wherein said bent                     
               portions have a U-shape, and the stator is fixed at a                  
               portion of the inner circumferential surface of the                    
               case body which corresponds to a base portion of the                   
               U-shape.                                                               
               The examiner’s determination (see pages 4, 6 and 7 in the              
          answer) that Moribayashi’s holder plate 45 meets the reinforcing            
          portion limitations in claim 1 is well founded.  The holder plate           
          45, which is in the vicinity of an end portion of Moribayashi’s             
          stator (magnets 42), includes a ring portion in the form of its             
          annular base which is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of             
          the yoke 41 and a cylinder portion in the form of its bent spring           
          portions 45a, spacers 45b and tabs containing holes 45c which               
          extend from the outer peripheral edge of the ring portion.  The             
          appellants’ argument that elements 45a, 45b and 45c fail to                 
          respond to the recitation of the cylinder portion because “the              
          cylinder portion of the present invention is clearly continuous”            

                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007