Appeal No. 2005-0175 Page 13
Application No. 09/241,700
shall affirm the later rejection for the reasons discussed above
and in the answer.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 9-12 and 14
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Henley in
view of Winningstad and to reject claims 11 and 14 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Henley in view of
Winningstad and Shiomi is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007