Ex Parte Schopf - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          



                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                        

                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                             Ex parte REINHOLD SCHOPF                                                   
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-0180                                                   
                                               Application No. 09/928,070                                               
                                                      ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                      
              Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      


                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's non-final rejection (in the Office                
              action mailed May 15, 2003) of claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 15.  Claims 11, 12,                     
              16 and 17, the only other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from                   
              further consideration.  Claims 1 through 7 have been cancelled.                                           


                     As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s invention relates to a stylus                 
              and, in particular, to a stylus for use in a coordinate-measuring machine wherein the                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007