The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte REINHOLD SCHOPF ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0180 Application No. 09/928,070 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's non-final rejection (in the Office action mailed May 15, 2003) of claims 8 through 10 and 13 through 15. Claims 11, 12, 16 and 17, the only other claims remaining in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration. Claims 1 through 7 have been cancelled. As noted on page 1 of the specification, appellant’s invention relates to a stylus and, in particular, to a stylus for use in a coordinate-measuring machine wherein thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007