The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte HELENE G. BAZIN and FRANK W. BARRESI ___________ Appeal No. 2005-0191 Application No. 09/971,239 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before, ELLIS, ADAMS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-8, 15-19 and 27-34, all the claims pending in the application. Claims 9-14, 20-26, and 35-73 have been canceled. As a preliminary matter, we note the appellants’ statement on page 2 of the main brief that the claims do not stand or fall together. The appellants state that there arePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007