The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte ERWIN B. BELLERS _____________ Appeal No. 2005-0200 Application No. 09/840,817 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the claims pending in the present application. An amendment filed February 12, 2004 after final rejection was approved for entry by the Examiner. The disclosed invention relates to a video signal processor which evaluates candidate vectors of enhancement algorithmsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007