Ex Parte Peterson et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0206                                                        
          Application No. 10/310,420                                                  

               b) a plurality of conduit segments mounted within each                 
               ductwork segment;                                                      
               c) a detachable coupling on at least one end of each conduit           
               segment; and                                                           
               d) a support column attached to and extending downward from            
               at least one of the generally horizontally extending                   
               ductwork segments for supporting said ductwork assembly from           
               a floor of a room.                                                     
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Chambers                      2,461,197             Feb.  8, 1949           
          Kromer                        3,011,681             Dec.  5, 1961           
          Kok et al. (Kok)              3,747,632             Jul. 24, 1973           
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a modular fluid           
          transmission system comprising a modular ductwork assembly having           
          a plurality of conduit segments mounted therein.  The fluid                 
          transmission system also comprises a support column that is                 
          attached to and extends downward from the horizontally extending            
          ductwork segments.  The support column supports the assembly from           
          a floor of a room.                                                          
               Appealed claims 23, 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kok in view of Kromer.  Claim           
          25 also stands rejected under § 103 as being unpatentable over              
          Kok in view of Kromer and Chambers.                                         


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007