Ex Parte Moreau - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         




                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                      Ex parte MARYELLEN ROONEY MOREAU                                                 
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-0211                                                  
                                              Application No. 10/264,717                                               

                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before CAROFF, KIMLIN, and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6 and                
              8-28, all the claims now pending in appellant’s application.                                             
                     The appealed claims are directed to a teaching aid in the form of a doll or puppet.               
                     Claim 1, which is one of three independent claims, is illustrative of the subject                 
              matter embodied in appellant’s claims:                                                                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007