Appeal No. 2005-0222 Page 6
Application No. 09/923,629
taught by the prior art, or to go to the upper limit of the time range taught by the
prior art, to determine the optimum values, and the rejection is reversed.
Finally, claims 4 and 5 stand rejected as obvious over the previous
combination as further combined with Hernandez. As Hernandez is relied upon
for teaching that silicate solutions are useful in the removal of free fatty acids in
crude oils such as crude vegetable oils, it does not remedy the deficiencies of the
previous combination, and this rejection is also reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007