The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DAVID A. EDWARDS, RICHARD P. BATYCKY, and LLOYD JOHNSTON __________ Appeal No. 2005-0224 Application No. 09/878,146 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before MILLS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-27, 33-38, 152 and 155, which are the claims pending on appeal in this application. Claims 156 and 157 have been indicated by the examiner to contain allowable subject matter. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal and reads as follows: 1. A method of delivering an agent to the pulmonary system, in a single, breath- activated step, comprising administering particles comprising an agent from a receptacle having a mass consisting of said particles to a subject’s respiratory tract, wherein:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007