Ex Parte Liscinksy - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0233                                                        
          Application 10/085,138                                                      

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.   A three phase supervisory circuit for detecting fault             
          conditions in an input AC power signal, comprising:                         
               a first sensing circuit for detecting a voltage level for a            
          first phase of said AC power signal and comparing said voltage              
          level of said first phase to a threshold value;                             
               a second sensing circuit for detecting a voltage level for a           
          second phase of said AC power signal and comparing said voltage             
          level of said second phase to said threshold value;                         
               a third sensing circuit for detecting a voltage level for a            
          third phase of said AC power signal and comparing said voltage              
          level of said third phase to said threshold value;                          
               a delay circuit for delaying initial operation of said                 
          sensing circuits for a predetermined period each time said                  
          supervisory circuit is powered on; and                                      
               an activation circuit for receiving indication signals from            
          said sensing and delay circuits, said indication signals                    
          indicative of whether said predetermined period of time has                 
          elapsed and said voltage levels of said phases have met said                
          threshold value.                                                            
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Holmquest                     3,535,591          Oct. 20, 1970              
          Tran et al. (Tran)            5,224,010          June 29, 1993              
          Earle                         5,642,052          June 24, 1997              
          Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                    
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Holmquest in view of            
          Tran with respect to claims 1-7 and 11-18, and Earle is added to            
          this combination with respect to claims 8-10.                               


                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007