The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ROLAND DE LA METTRIE
and
FRANCOISE BOUDY
_______________
Appeal No. 2005-0241
Application No. 09/904,831
_______________
HEARD: February 9, 2005
_______________
Before WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAWLIKOWSKI,
Administrative Patent Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 30 through 34
and 37 through 71.1
Claim 30 is representative of the subject matter on
appeal, and is set forth below:
30. A composition for the oxidation dyeing of keratin
fibres comprising:
1 Claim 36 has been indicated as containing allowable subject
matter by the examiner. Office Action of Paper No. 8, page 2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007