Ex Parte ANDERSON - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0264                                                        
          Application No. 09/139,298                                                  

          Stern et al. (Stern)     5,054,059           Oct. 01, 1991                  
          Stear, “A Handbook of Breadmaking Technology”, Elsevier Science             
          Publishing Co., Inc., NY (1990).  Pages 210-213, 400-406, 523-              
          524, 606.  (Stear)                                                          
          Litwak, “New Software Gives Operators More Dough”, Supermarket              
          Business, vol. 45, no. 6 (June 1990). Page 1A(3). (Litwak)                  
          Muskal, “Making dough with the PC”, PC Magazine, v3, p228(5),               
          (February 7, 1984). (Muskal)                                                
               Appellant’s claimed invention is directed to an automated              
          process for producing a variety of baked food products.  The                
          process entails providing a machine having an electronic process            
          control unit that can be electronically interfaced by a consumer            
          for ordering a particular baked product from a list of a variety            
          of products.  The machine comprises the requisite plurality of              
          storage devices for the raw ingredients, a dough making apparatus           
          and a baking station.  The machine is able to deliver a final               
          baked product in response to an order from a consumer via a                 
          keyboard, an automated phone answering device or a modem of a               
          remote computer.                                                            
               Appealed claims 1, 4-8, 16, 18 and 19 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, description requirement.  The             
          appealed claims also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007