Appeal No. 2005-0308
Application 09/934,349
Accordingly, based on our consideration of the totality of the record before us, we have
weighed the evidence of obviousness found in the combined teachings of Vanselow and Stein,
the combined teachings of Vanselow, Stein and Dam and the combined teachings of Vanselow,
Stein and Gordon, with appellants’ countervailing evidence of and argument for nonobviousness
and conclude that the claimed invention encompassed by appealed claims 2 through 6 would
have been obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
The examiner’s decision is affirmed.
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007