The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 10 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte THOMAS WINTERS FOX _____________ Appeal No. 2005-0342 Application No. 09/758,787 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before: HAIRSTON, LEVY and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 7 through 24 and 27.1 For the reasons stated infra we affirm the examiner’s rejection of these claims. 1 The Examiner states, on pages 2 and 9 of the answer, that the rejection of claims 25 and 26 is withdrawn.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007